Los Angeles Dodgers: 5 Reasons for Owner Frank McCourt to Walk Away Quietly

Doug Mead@@Sports_A_HolicX.com LogoCorrespondent IApril 21, 2011

Los Angeles Dodgers: 5 Reasons for Owner Frank McCourt to Walk Away Quietly

0 of 5

    LOS ANGELES, CA - OCTOBER 03:  Owner Frank McCourt celebrates after winning the National League West against the Colorado Rockies on October 3, 2009 in Los Angeles, California.  (Photo by Jacob de Golish/Getty Images)
    Jacob de Golish/Getty Images

    Wednesday's announcement by Major League Baseball that they are effectively taking control of the Los Angeles Dodgers and will assume day-to-day operations of the team sends one giant statement: an indictment of the mismanagement under the ownership of Frank McCourt.

    While teams have been taken over by MLB in the past (Montreal Expos in 2002, Texas Rangers in 2010), the actions taken yesterday by MLB commissioner Bud Selig are indeed unprecedented.

    Certainly, there have been some less than stellar owners of teams in the past, however none were taken over for complete mismanagement.

    And we are not just talking about the mismanagement of money, which has become evident in the wake of the McCourts' pending divorce and recent facts regarding the overall McCourt debt, but also the mismanagement of Dodger Stadium and its security, which led to the brutal beating of San Francisco Giants fan Bryan Stow on Opening Day.

    The Los Angeles Dodgers are not just one of the most revered franchises in baseball, but also one of the most revered in all of sports, period. Bud Selig is not about to let it be run into the ground by irresponsible ownership.

    Here are five reasons why current owner Frank McCourt should choose not to fight and just simply sell the team and walk away quietly.

    For continuing coverage of Major League Baseball, follow Doug on Twitter @Sports_A_Holic.

1. The IRS Will Be Knocking on Frank McCourt’s Door Very Shortly

1 of 5

    HOLLYWOOD - JUNE 20:  Team owner Frank McCourt speaks at a special star ceremony honoring the Los Angeles Dodgers with an Award of Excellence on the Hollywood Walk of Fame on June 20, 2008 in Hollywood, California.  (Photo by Vince Bucci/Getty Images)
    Vince Bucci/Getty Images

    Like Los Angeles Dodgers’ owner Frank McCourt doesn’t have enough problems to deal with. TMZ.com is reporting that the Internal Revenue Service has apparently launched an investigation after facts were revealed in the McCourt divorce proceedings.

    The IRS wants to know why the McCourts took $145 million from the team itself and never reported taxes on the borrowed money.

    The IRS is also interested in the McCourts' children receiving salaries from the team for jobs that they never had.

    Other questionable accounting practices are being investigated by the IRS as well, including team losses that were carried forward from year to year.

    The California Franchise Tax Board is also on board with its own investigation, sources have told TMZ.

2. The Frank McCourt-FOX Proposed Television Contract Smells Like a Rat

2 of 5

    Back in February, MLB commissioner Bud Selig turned down a loan that FOX was entering into with Frank McCourt. The loan was for $200 million and was to be backed by collateral.

    However, the collateral was to be the future television rights that FOX was to control. According to the Los Angeles Times, if the loan was not repaid by McCourt, the current television contract with FOX would have been extended by four years.

    Selig and his office declined comment at the time regarding the reasons for his denial, however he did say that he would consider withholding approval of any broadcast contract that was proposed by McCourt.

    Now, McCourt and FOX are trying to push a deal that would guarantee television broadcast rights to FOX for the next 20 years at a price of $3 billion, money that McCourt would surely use to ease his $430 million debt load and to settle his divorce.

    Selig is not about to let any owner use money intended for a franchise to be used by an owner to bail out their personal debt.

    Not only that, but FOX owned the Dodgers from 1998-2004, selling the team to McCourt, and FOX did not exactly endear themselves to Dodgers’ fans with their stewardship of the team.

    Like I said, if it smells like a rat…

3. McCourt’s Continued Ownership of Team Will Drive Ticket Sales into Tank

3 of 5

    LOS ANGELES, CA - APRIL 14:  A Los Angeles Police Department officer looks out from an outfield pavillion at Dodger Stadium prior to the start of the baseball game between the St. Louis Cardinals and Los Angeles Dodgers on April 14, 2011 in Los Angeles, C
    Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images

    Attendance figures at Dodgers Stadium are clearly down. While they will toe the company line and say season ticket sales have been unaffected, the total fans attending say otherwise.

    For a weekend series with the St. Louis Cardinals and Albert Pujols, the Dodgers drew a Friday night crowd of just over 36,000 fans, their smallest Friday night crowd in eight years. It was worse for the Saturday and Sunday games, attendance was down significantly: 31,614 for Saturday, and only 27,439 for a Sunday matinee game.

    Those numbers will continue to drop with the current mess, and with declining attendance numbers, McCourt surely won’t be paying off his debts anytime soon.

4. Sentiment in Confrontation Between McCourt and Selig Decidedly One-Sided

4 of 5

    ARLINGTON, TX - SEPTEMBER 29:  MLB commisioner Bud Selig talks with the media at Rangers Ballpark in Arlington on September 29, 2010 in Arlington, Texas.  (Photo by Ronald Martinez/Getty Images)
    Ronald Martinez/Getty Images

    If Frank McCourt thinks for one second that he can take on Bud Selig and Major League Baseball and win, I have a bridge I can sell him. It will go nicely with his highly-leveraged Boston parking lots.

    Bud Selig did not come to this decision lightly. The Dodgers were already being investigated by Major League Baseball; Selig inasmuch said that in his statement today.

    “My office will continue its thorough investigation into the operations and finances of the Dodgers and related entities during the period of Mr. McCourt's ownership.”

    Sounds like an investigation has been ongoing to me, how about you?

    On another note, McCourt could very well be in violation of the debt-service rule, implemented in baseball’s collective bargaining agreement.

    In the CBA, the rule states that “clubs cannot borrow to pay existing debt but must raise revenue or reduce expenses to pay existing non-player-related debt.”

    Isn’t that exactly what McCourt is trying to do?

5. McCourt’s Legacy Will Look a Lot Better If He Just Walks Away Without a Fight

5 of 5

    LOS ANGELES, CA - AUGUST 31:  Frank McCourt, owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers, arrives at Los Angeles County Superior Court for day two of a non-jury divorce trial on August 31, 2010 in Los Angeles, California. The trial, being presided over by Judge Scot
    Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images

    These days, everyone in the public eye worries about the legacy they leave behind. Obviously, now that MLB has assumed control of the Los Angeles Dodgers, Frank McCourt’s legacy is not one that will be looked upon fondly.

    However, it would be a LOT worse if McCourt vows to fight, as his statement made on Wednesday seemed to indicate as such.

    "Major League Baseball sets strict financial guidelines which all 30 teams must follow. The Dodgers are in compliance with these guidelines. On this basis, it is hard to understand the commissioner's decision today."

    There seems to be a lot lately that Frank McCourt can’t understand. He certainly can’t understand how to run a storied major league franchise.

X